The
Pedagogy of the Oppressed, chapter one, explains how to become human
beings. We live in a society that that has a distorted view of what it means to
be human. There are two types of people in the world, the oppressor and the
oppressed.
The
oppressor, in the act of trying to be “human, “ dehumanizes the oppressed. The
oppressors believe they have freedom. (Which they don’t) The oppressed on the
other hand start to believe they are of little worth and see no other way than
to be under the rule of the oppressor. It is ironic because they (the
oppressed) are the key to restoring humanity. In order to achieve humanity, the
oppressed need to fight for their freedom, which is responsibility and the
right to self govern. This conquest is not impossible but the oppressed must
overcome their lack of confidence and ACT!
The
oppressed must overlook their current situation and see themselves as powerful
figures. In order to do this, they need
to continuously reflect on who they are and what they are doing to act. By
acting, they become the oppressors of the former oppressors. If they are not acting
correctly, they will switch roles and become the new oppressors. If the pedagogy
is rightfully achieved, the (former) oppressors will sympathize with the
oppressed and all will be equal. At the
end of the reading it briefly revealed who exactly the oppressed and oppressors
are. The oppressors are teachers and the
oppressed are students.
So what does this all mean? I
believe it means that our education is changing. It used to be that teachers
were the leaders and students saw the teacher as a feared authority figure.
Teachers taught by lecture. One-way communication. Education has come a long
way since then. We have found that classrooms work more effectively when
teachers and students work together (as the reading states) “re-creating that
knowledge.” This knowledge comes from constant reflection and action. The goal
of the classroom is to attain freedom and human equality. If teachers and students work together and
create a space where two-way communication, positive feedback, and an uplifting
atmosphere coexist, students will be successful in their role as a learner and
creator of knowledge.
This text was very difficult to
understand and I still am not sure if have a clear idea of the point this text
was trying to make. I did like nor understand the reasoning behind people
having “objective” and “subjective” views. It says that they cannot exist
together or apart and they contradict each other, therefore they do not exist.
And yet society needs to have an objective view in order to correctly act.
I also did not agree with the
portion that explains the oppressed as being a flock that does not make a decision
without everybody else agreeing at the same time. If we look at it from a
classroom perspective, there are small groups of students who group together
and generally agree on a choice before voicing it, but somewhere along the
line, an individual had to express an opinion in order for there to be
action.
I thought this informational text
danced around a simple concept and was very repetitive explaining it. The level
of diction was unnecessarily high and was probably put in place for the purpose
of confusion. I felt oppressed! It seemed in some ways, a false representation
and over exaggerated interpretation of the educational system.
No comments:
Post a Comment